MAMEWorld >> News
Previous thread Previous  View all threads Index   Next thread Next   Threaded Mode Threaded  

Pages: 1

John IVModerator
IV/Play, MAME, MAMEUI
Reged: 09/22/03
Posts: 1969
Loc: Washington, USA
Send PM


[Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released.
#304116 - 02/11/13 06:20 PM


http://www.mameui.info/

Also check out Future Pinball w/ the new Physics 2.5 MOD.



john iv
http://www.mameui.info/



redk9258
Regular
Reged: 09/21/03
Posts: 3968
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
Send PM


MAMEUI_0.148u1b_32-bit... new [Re: John IV]
#304150 - 02/11/13 11:58 PM Attachment: MAMEUI_0.148u1b_32-bit.7z 20637 KB (58 downloads)


See attached...



Llaffer
MAME Fan
Reged: 05/04/11
Posts: 231
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: John IV]
#304203 - 02/12/13 09:37 PM


Is there a trick to getting 148u1 compiled for MameUI64? I've been compiling my own versions of MAME for almost 2 years now, and have had problems with 148 and 148u1.

Thanks.



Dullaron
Diablo III - Dunard #1884
Reged: 07/22/05
Posts: 6125
Loc: Fort Worth, Tx
Send PM


MameUI64 .148.1 crashes with the hlsl on. new [Re: John IV]
#304205 - 02/12/13 10:37 PM


It happen when I switch over to another game. I had to exit out MameUI64 before start another one up.



W11 Home 64-bit + Nobara OS / AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.59 GHz / RAM 64 GB



redk9258
Regular
Reged: 09/21/03
Posts: 3968
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: Llaffer]
#304210 - 02/13/13 01:26 AM


> Is there a trick to getting 148u1 compiled for MameUI64? I've been compiling my own
> versions of MAME for almost 2 years now, and have had problems with 148 and 148u1.
>
> Thanks.

Are you using the new tools?

I use...

Quote:



call D:\MINGW\mingw64-w64\setenv.bat
make all -j5 OSD=winui EMULATOR=MAMEUI64.exe
if exist MAMEUI64.exe call MakeHelp.bat





Llaffer
MAME Fan
Reged: 05/04/11
Posts: 231
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: redk9258]
#304218 - 02/13/13 05:35 AM


Yeah. I'm using the latest tools. mame64.exe compiles just fine.

Here's the batch file that I've tried using:


Code:

@echo off
set compiler=g:\mingw64-w64
pushd %compiler%

call setenv.bat
call setup-Python.bat
call setup-Qt.bat

popd

make -i all -j5
make -i all -j5 OSD=winui




redk9258
Regular
Reged: 09/21/03
Posts: 3968
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: Llaffer]
#304233 - 02/13/13 01:04 PM


I don't think you need these every compile...
call setup-Python.bat
call setup-Qt.bat

Once they have been run, they are installed.


What is..

pushd %compiler%
and
popd

for?


Why ignore errors with...

make -i



Llaffer
MAME Fan
Reged: 05/04/11
Posts: 231
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: redk9258]
#304239 - 02/13/13 04:45 PM


> I don't think you need these every compile...
> call setup-Python.bat
> call setup-Qt.bat
>
> Once they have been run, they are installed.
>
>
> What is..
>
> pushd %compiler%
> and
> popd
>
> for?
>
>
> Why ignore errors with...
>
> make -i

ok. I'll take out the python and QT items.

"pushd" is the same as "cd", except it puts the directory in a stack in memory, which when I "popd" goes back to the previous directory in the stack. If this was unix, I'd use "cd" and "cd -" to go back to the initial directory.

I had -i in there from back when one of the extra programs would fail compile, stopping the rest of the make, so I added -i so the rest of the bundle would compile (including mame64.exe) I guess it is no longer needed now.

Does setenv.bat do anything besides putting the compiler's BIN directory in the path? I've already done that at the system level, so if that's all it does, I can probably ignore that, too. but for now, it's still in there.



AntoPISA
MAME Snapper
Reged: 09/15/08
Posts: 2902
Loc: Pisa, Italy
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: John IV]
#304245 - 02/13/13 06:25 PM


Unofficial 32bit executables available here: progetto-SNAPS Unstable MAMEUI32 Page.



Site: https://www.progettosnaps.net/
Board: progetto-SNAPS Official Board
Twitter: @progettosnaps



Outrun2006
MAME Fan
Reged: 03/15/07
Posts: 557
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: AntoPISA]
#304313 - 02/15/13 03:43 AM


Thank you gentleben



redk9258
Regular
Reged: 09/21/03
Posts: 3968
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: Outrun2006]
#304315 - 02/15/13 04:06 AM


> Thank you gentleben

Who's ben? LOL



RevO EmaG
A trick is something a whore does for money.....or candy!
Reged: 09/13/05
Posts: 83
Loc: Probably on the sh*tter...
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: redk9258]
#304323 - 02/15/13 05:59 AM


"gentle" Ben Dover




Llaffer
MAME Fan
Reged: 05/04/11
Posts: 231
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: Llaffer]
#304423 - 02/16/13 04:41 PM


Any additional thoughts on what I could try to get compiling UI to work?



Mamesick
Troll Lamer
Reged: 09/21/03
Posts: 1649
Loc: Italy
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: Llaffer]
#304432 - 02/16/13 05:35 PM


I don't use 'all' for MAMEUI.
Only 'make -j5 PTR64=1 OSD=winui'
(PTR64=1 to be sure the 64-bit architecture is used, but some people says it's useless because it should be auto-detected. I have never been really sure about this so I put it in my batch file in every case)



Llaffer
MAME Fan
Reged: 05/04/11
Posts: 231
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: Mamesick]
#304437 - 02/16/13 08:27 PM


> I don't use 'all' for MAMEUI.
> Only 'make -j5 PTR64=1 OSD=winui'
> (PTR64=1 to be sure the 64-bit architecture is used, but some people says it's
> useless because it should be auto-detected. I have never been really sure about this
> so I put it in my batch file in every case)

I'll give that a try to see if it does anything. Though, I have tested it without the PTR64 argument, and it does properly detect 32vs64. I also took out the -i, so this is the command that I'm using to compile now:


Code:

make -j5 OSD=winui



We'll see how well it works with that.

EDIT:

I still get this:

Code:


In file included from src/osd/winui/mui_opts.c:49:0:
src/osd/winui/game_opts.h: In member function 'void game_options::load_settings(const char*, int)':
src/osd/winui/game_opts.h:111:3: error: 'string_iterator' was not declared in this scope
src/osd/winui/game_opts.h:111:19: error: expected ';' before 'value_str'
src/osd/winui/game_opts.h:116:9: error: 'value_str' was not declared in this scope
Compiling src/osd/winui/dirwatch.c...
make: *** [obj/winui64/osd/winui/mui_opts.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Code:

 







RobbbertModerator
Sir
Reged: 08/21/04
Posts: 3200
Loc: A long way from you
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: Llaffer]
#304443 - 02/16/13 11:29 PM


>
> EDIT:
>
> I still get this:
>
> In file included from src/osd/winui/mui_opts.c0:
> src/osd/winui/game_opts.h: In member function 'void game_options::load_settings(const
> char*, int)':
> src/osd/winui/game_opts.h3: error: 'string_iterator' was not declared in this scope
> src/osd/winui/game_opts.h19: error: expected ';' before 'value_str'
> src/osd/winui/game_opts.h9: error: 'value_str' was not declared in this scope
> Compiling src/osd/winui/dirwatch.c...
> make: *** [obj/winui64/osd/winui/mui_opts.o] Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

There should have been a replacement astring.c and astring.h included in the package. These replace the existing ones. MAMEUI should probably be rewritten to avoid needing this, as the proper core ones have been sped up.



Llaffer
MAME Fan
Reged: 05/04/11
Posts: 231
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: Robbbert]
#304448 - 02/17/13 02:17 AM


> There should have been a replacement astring.c and astring.h included in the package.
> These replace the existing ones. MAMEUI should probably be rewritten to avoid needing
> this, as the proper core ones have been sped up.

My astring.c file is timestamped 8-18-12.
My astring.h file is timestamped 1-11-13 (which is the date that I originally extracted the 148 MAME source).

Are these different from yours?



John IVModerator
IV/Play, MAME, MAMEUI
Reged: 09/22/03
Posts: 1969
Loc: Washington, USA
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: Llaffer]
#304450 - 02/17/13 03:40 AM


He means in the MameUI source, those are two altered files you should have extracted into the baseline source tree.



john iv
http://www.mameui.info/



Llaffer
MAME Fan
Reged: 05/04/11
Posts: 231
Send PM


Re: [Annc] MameUI64 .148.1 released. new [Re: John IV]
#304468 - 02/17/13 08:11 AM


Ahh. I guess I missed that. I'll try it. thanks.

EDIT: That did it. Thanks.

Edited by Llaffer (02/17/13 08:44 AM)



bocuk
MAME Fan
Reged: 02/21/13
Posts: 1
Send PM


Re: MAMEUI_0.148u1b_32-bit... new [Re: redk9258]
#304762 - 02/22/13 04:57 PM


Thank you so much.


Pages: 1

MAMEWorld >> News
Previous thread Previous  View all threads Index   Next thread Next   Threaded Mode Threaded  

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  John IV, Robbbert, Tafoid 
0 registered and 226 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 4689