italie |
|
MAME owes italie many thank yous, hah
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/20/03
|
|
Posts: 15246
|
|
Loc: BoomTown
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Oh Hai! Just Hangin out on Marz
#298428 - 11/03/12 04:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
umm... what took the picture? (nt)
[Re: italie]
#298433 - 11/03/12 08:04 AM
|
|
|
|
Just broke my personal record for number of consecutive days without dying!
|
|
| Tomu Breidah |
|
No Problems, Only Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 08/14/04
|
|
Posts: 6825
|
|
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
or _who_?
[Re: URherenow]
#298434 - 11/03/12 10:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|
| italie |
|
MAME owes italie many thank yous, hah
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/20/03
|
|
Posts: 15246
|
|
Loc: BoomTown
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: umm... what took the picture? (nt)
[Re: URherenow]
#298438 - 11/03/12 02:43 PM
|
|
|
Stitched together from 54 shots off of 2 cameras IIRC
|
|
|
| DMala |
|
Sleep is overrated
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 05/09/05
|
|
Posts: 3989
|
|
Loc: Waltham, MA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: umm... what took the picture? (nt)
[Re: URherenow]
#298439 - 11/03/12 02:53 PM
|
|
|
Clearly it was someone walking through the California desert where they're faking all of this Mars exploration stuff. 
|
|
|
|
Re: umm... what took the picture? (nt)
[Re: URherenow]
#298454 - 11/03/12 10:21 PM
|
|
|
That's LBJ's back yard again. They're still using the same old set from the moon landings except with a different lens filter.
|
Pessimist: Oh, this can't get any worse!
Optimist: Yes, it can!
|
|
|
Re: umm... what took the picture? (nt)
[Re: italie]
#298458 - 11/04/12 12:40 AM
|
|
|
*Brain explodes*
Did the rover put a camera on a tripod?
This is BS. At first, it was believable because the camera was obviously attached to an arm on the rover.
|
Just broke my personal record for number of consecutive days without dying!
|
|
| italie |
|
MAME owes italie many thank yous, hah
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/20/03
|
|
Posts: 15246
|
|
Loc: BoomTown
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: umm... what took the picture? (nt)
[Re: URherenow]
#298461 - 11/04/12 01:03 AM
|
|
|
> *Brain explodes*
>
> Did the rover put a camera on a tripod?
>
> This is BS. At first, it was believable because the camera was obviously attached to
> an arm on the rover.
Not to much experience stitching photos together, eh? Not that hard to eliminate the arm if you have a few similar perspective points.
Edited by italie (11/04/12 02:09 AM)
|
|
|
|
Re: umm... what took the picture? (nt)
[Re: URherenow]
#298462 - 11/04/12 01:54 AM
|
|
|
Not what, when. Not when, shit. Not shit, fuck. Not fuck, hairy set of balls. Not hairy set of balls, shaved cunt.
|
|
|
| Tomu Breidah |
|
No Problems, Only Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 08/14/04
|
|
Posts: 6825
|
|
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
3/4ths Down, 1/3rd over: Unexplained Shadow [nt]
[Re: italie]
#298473 - 11/04/12 07:03 AM
|
|
|
hovering camera! 
I know... stitching. Seen the post.
|
LEVEL-4
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
Oh Hai! Just Hangin out on Marz
Reply
[Re: 
so I can't get the embed code. 
