|
Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
#297263 - 10/09/12 09:38 AM
|
|
|
Why is the background-image property being used to set the background color instead of background-color in the CSS for the body element?
Same question goes for .spacer class.
|
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: tamarillo]
#297264 - 10/09/12 09:59 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Why is the background-image property being used to set the background color instead of background-color in the CSS for the body element?
Same question goes for .spacer class.
Because Smitdogg is too busy enjoying his arsehole to learn web development, twisty has done nothing in years besides smoke joints and eat bacon, and Roc is the new Lev.
|
|
|
| Dullaron |
|
Diablo III - Dunard #1884
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 07/22/05
|
|
Posts: 6125
|
|
Loc: Fort Worth, Tx
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: Matty_]
#297267 - 10/09/12 10:23 AM
|
|
|
> Why is the background-image property being used to set the background color instead
> of background-color in the CSS for the body element?
>
> Same question goes for .spacer class.
>
> Because Smitdogg is too busy enjoying his arsehole to learn web development, twisty
> has done nothing in years besides smoke joints and eat bacon, and Roc is the new Lev.
LOL
|
W11 Home 64-bit + Nobara OS / AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.59 GHz / RAM 64 GB
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: tamarillo]
#297285 - 10/09/12 06:09 PM
|
|
|
If you mean the front page of .info (the page with ads), it's made by KC so I don't know. If you mean the forum software, it works and I absolutely could not care less about something being "proper code". I only care about "working".
|
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: tamarillo]
#297335 - 10/10/12 09:52 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: twisty]
#297336 - 10/10/12 10:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: Matty_]
#297337 - 10/10/12 10:01 AM
|
|
|
> twisty has done nothing in years besides smoke joints and eat bacon
If I don't, who will? 
|
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: Matty_]
#297338 - 10/10/12 10:09 AM
|
|
|
> HTML4 transitional? Which century are you chilling in?
I'm still using Win2k Pro...does that answer your question? 
*retro master of the universe*
|
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: twisty]
#297341 - 10/10/12 11:34 AM
|
|
|
> > HTML4 transitional? Which century are you chilling in?
>
> I'm still using Win2k Pro...does that answer your question?
>
> *retro master of the universe*
I also use win2k pro... on a 0.5Ghz single-cpu celeron pc.
Also, I agree with your sentiments... if it works leave it alone.
edit: oh, btw wb 
|
|
|
| Gor |
|
Giver of truth.
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 1925
|
|
Loc: The basement
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: Smitdogg]
#297360 - 10/10/12 09:37 PM
|
|
|
> If you mean the front page of .info (the page with ads), it's made by KC so I don't
> know. If you mean the forum software, it works and I absolutely could not care less
> about something being "proper code". I only care about "working".
I used to work with a guy that would go through code and make it proper, sometimes changing it from working to not working
in the process. If he would have stopped doing that after being told to multiple times, I would probably still work with him.
|
Oh for Pete's sake.
loser.com
|
|
| snake78 |
|
sineku setenta y ocho
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/22/03
|
|
Posts: 1348
|
|
Loc: Newport, RI
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: twisty]
#297361 - 10/10/12 10:52 PM
|
|
|
> > HTML4 transitional? Which century are you chilling in?
>
> I'm still using Win2k Pro...does that answer your question?
>
> *retro master of the universe*
still? it wasn't that long ago that you upgraded from win98se, iirc...
That should answer his question...
|
www.randyrobbinsmusic.com
RandyRobbinsMusic on Facebook
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: snake78]
#297469 - 10/13/12 02:44 AM
|
|
|
My concern is with the fact that it's inefficient - serving 2.4kB for a plain, non-gradient background color.
Also, disabling images at the front page will render the links beside the main content to become unreadable, a usability issue.
But whatever, it doesn't matter.
I have to feed the birds, farewell.
|
|
|
italie |
|
MAME owes italie many thank yous, hah
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/20/03
|
|
Posts: 15246
|
|
Loc: BoomTown
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
[Re: tamarillo]
#297499 - 10/13/12 06:00 PM
|
|
|
> My concern is with the fact that it's inefficient - serving 2.4kB for a plain,
> non-gradient background color.
>
> Also, disabling images at the front page will render the links beside the main
> content to become unreadable, a usability issue.
>
> But whatever, it doesn't matter.
>
> I have to feed the birds, farewell.
Nice proxy.
|
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
Mameworld.info front page background image - why?
Reply
[Re: 
