|
another compiling question...
#285199 - 05/06/12 10:29 PM
|
|
|
I am still having problems. Re-downloaded everything & started over. Same results. 145s compiles fine by itself.
Problems start when I patch with u1. Says it finds "Reversed patch detected! Assume -R? © Nettomo EOF Apply anyway? © Nettomo" I've tried it both ways, all yeses and all nos. Comes up with hunks of data rejected some written, most rejected. Ends with an ignored error 1 when linking mame.
I've never had a problem like this ever(years!)
u1 is all I've tried today becuase if it doesn't work to point of compiling correctly, u2 and on won't work either.
Help. Thoughts or ideas anyone ?.!
Later...
|
Pessimist: Oh, this can't get any worse!
Optimist: Yes, it can!
|
|
| B2K24 |
|
MAME @ 15 kHz Sony Trinitron CRT user
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/25/10
|
|
Posts: 2663
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: another compiling question...
[Re: Bad A Billy]
#285209 - 05/06/12 11:13 PM
|
|
|
How are you patching the u1 diff?
You need to use
patch -p0 -E < 0145u1.diff
Hopefully your not using your C:\ drive because files can be locked by the O/S or UAC stuff so I always use secondary drives or even USB flash.
|
|
|
| redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: another compiling question...
[Re: Bad A Billy]
#285234 - 05/07/12 01:03 AM
|
|
|
Are you using the official patch tools from http://mamedev.org/tools/ ?
Set your path to ONLY include C:\mingw\mingw64-w64\bin OR where ever patch.exe resides.
What is your OS?
|
|
|
| B2K24 |
|
MAME @ 15 kHz Sony Trinitron CRT user
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/25/10
|
|
Posts: 2663
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: another compiling question...
[Re: Bad A Billy]
#285244 - 05/07/12 02:30 AM
|
|
|
What is © Nettomo?
If you have redownloaded everything from mamedev.org you should have 0 problems and 0 weird prompts.
Are you using mingw-mame-w32-20110519.exe OR mingw-mame-w64-20110519.exe extracted to the root of a drive?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what the netmomo stuff is. Didn't type it and didn't notice it when I sent it. Although something funny did happen when I hit continue. Clicked and IE shut down to the desktop. Logged back in and thought I'd have to re-post but it was there!?! Figured whatever. Another mystery for later on.
Anyway, I got everything from dev site again. Here's how far I got this time and the directory tree. I have everything in it's place and/or pointed to where it should go. says I'm missing libemu.a. It's nowhere to be found.
Tired, so I'll try again tomorrow after work. If anyone has any other ideas I'd be happy to try them.
Thanks again...
Oh, XP Pro 64
[ATTACHED IMAGE - CLICK FOR FULL SIZE]
Edited by Bad A Billy (05/07/12 04:14 AM)
|
Pessimist: Oh, this can't get any worse!
Optimist: Yes, it can!
|
|
| redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: another compiling question...
[Re: Bad A Billy]
#285268 - 05/07/12 04:51 AM
|
|
|
XP seems to be buggy with the compiler. If you were building a 32-bit version, I would say try it in Win PE. I could tell you how to get it free for your own use (use a Windows Vista or Windows 7 startup repair disc or anything based on one). Win PE doesn't support running 32-bit apps in a 64-bit environment, so you cannot build a 64-bit MAME in Win PE as far as I know because the compiler is 32-bit.
I posted before about compiling in WinPE with pictures, but cannot find the post.
|
|
|
| R. Belmont |
|
Cuckoo for IGAvania
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 9716
|
|
Loc: ECV-197 The Orville
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: another compiling question...
[Re: Bad A Billy]
#285346 - 05/07/12 04:44 PM
|
|
|
> I don't know what the netmomo stuff is. Didn't type it and didn't notice it when I
> sent it. Although something funny did happen when I hit continue. Clicked and IE shut
> down to the desktop. Logged back in and thought I'd have to re-post but it was
> there!?! Figured whatever. Another mystery for later on.
Between that and your compile problem, I'd strongly suspect a rootkit/virus/botnet. You might try scanning with some AV other than whatever your usual is.
|
|
|
Previous 
Index 
Next 
Threaded 
another compiling question...
Reply
[Re: 
