GatKong |
Tetris Mason
|
|
|
Reged: 04/20/07
|
Posts: 5907
|
Loc: Sector 9
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
We need more boobies!
#251944 - 04/16/11 06:24 PM
|
|
|
Help!
The Loony Bin used to have boobies! It helps me forget about the boobies in american politics.
I'm trying to ignore the fact that Obama's speech this week called Medicare and Medicaid the “single biggest contributors to our long-term deficit” only a couple years after he supposedly "fixed" that in a game-changing massive-sweeping healthcare reform bill passed under a democratic monopoly. Why are we still trying to fix that which they claimed was fixed... at the cost of trillions of dollars? Was that wasted money? Did we upend 1/3 of the US economy in sweeping reform for nothing? Were the Tea-Partiers right, that the reform bill was a sham to consolidate power from the people and wouldn't fix the costs of health care as they claimed? Were the Republican's right who said the healthcare bill would add, not subtract, from the spiraling costs? Should we trust Obama THIS time, even though both versions of reform, then and now, both depend on the same false cost saving measure of cutting reimbursements to doctors by 30%, which will never happen because 30% is the average profit margin of a medical practice, and the doctors sure aren't going to work for free. Should we ignore the fact that the 30% cut got "fixed" by the same democratic monopoly two weeks after the health care reform bill passed, undoing all the cost saving benefits it was supposed to provide, but by then the public was so exhausted by the debate they totally missed this fact. Should we ignore the fact that Obama MUST know this savings can never be realized, making his "new" budget proposal as much of a sham now as it was the first time they passed it then?
Hopefully never again will one party have unfettered control of the government. We need the two to balance each other out and keep each other honest.
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time - Abraham Lincoln
Now, if only we had some boobies to look at, to distract us, because without them I'll go mad.
|
|
|
Mr. Do |
MAME Art Editor
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
Posts: 4876
|
Loc: California
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: We need more boobies!
[Re: GatKong]
#251958 - 04/16/11 09:24 PM
|
|
|
> > Now, if only we had some boobies to look at, to distract us, because without them > I'll go mad.
|
RELAX and just have fun. Remember, it's all about the games.
|
|
|
The perfect word
[Re: GatKong]
#251961 - 04/16/11 10:52 PM
|
|
|
|
DMala |
Sleep is overrated
|
|
|
Reged: 05/09/05
|
Posts: 3989
|
Loc: Waltham, MA
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
|
Here you go...
[ATTACHED IMAGE - CLICK FOR FULL SIZE]
|
|
|
Jdurgi |
Regular
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
Posts: 1009
|
Loc: NEW England, CT
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: We need more boobies!
[Re: GatKong]
#251986 - 04/17/11 06:05 AM
|
|
|
> Help! > > The Loony Bin used to have boobies! It helps me forget about the boobies in american > politics. > > I'm trying to ignore the fact that Obama's speech this week called Medicare and > Medicaid the “single biggest contributors to our long-term deficit” only a couple > years after he supposedly "fixed" that in a game-changing massive-sweeping healthcare > reform bill passed under a democratic monopoly. Why are we still trying to fix that > which they claimed was fixed... at the cost of trillions of dollars? Was that wasted > money? Did we upend 1/3 of the US economy in sweeping reform for nothing? Were the > Tea-Partiers right, that the reform bill was a sham to consolidate power from the > people and wouldn't fix the costs of health care as they claimed? Were the > Republican's right who said the healthcare bill would add, not subtract, from the > spiraling costs? Should we trust Obama THIS time, even though both versions of > reform, then and now, both depend on the same false cost saving measure of cutting > reimbursements to doctors by 30%, which will never happen because 30% is the average > profit margin of a medical practice, and the doctors sure aren't going to work for > free. Should we ignore the fact that the 30% cut got "fixed" by the same democratic > monopoly two weeks after the health care reform bill passed, undoing all the cost > saving benefits it was supposed to provide, but by then the public was so exhausted > by the debate they totally missed this fact. Should we ignore the fact that Obama > MUST know this savings can never be realized, making his "new" budget proposal as > much of a sham now as it was the first time they passed it then? > > Hopefully never again will one party have unfettered control of the government. We > need the two to balance each other out and keep each other honest. > > You can fool some of the people all of the time, and you can fool all of the people > some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time - Abraham > Lincoln > > Now, if only we had some boobies to look at, to distract us, because without them > I'll go mad.
I could post a picture of the governor of my state. He's definitely a major boobie. He plans on raising corporate taxes pretty significantly which will drive out all corporations from our state, thus nullifying my job and my father's job. Even though he's been told by countless financial advisors and economic analysts, he still plans on raising the corporate taxes. Wouldn't mind hearing on the news that the boobie died.
And now I'm a bit uncomfortable because as I typed that, a huge rumble of thunder and burst of lightning happened. lol.
|
--------------------------------------------------
I am just a worthless liar.
I am just an imbecile.
I will only complicate you.
Trust in me and fall as well.
|
|
|
Re: We need more boobies!
[Re: DMala]
#251990 - 04/17/11 06:57 AM
|
|
|
*stares at feet*
"HEY FELLA! MY EYES ARE UP HERE!"
|
|
|
Andrew |
Girl Watcher
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
Posts: 5082
|
Loc: Boston, Mass.
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: We need more boobies!
[Re: GatKong]
#251995 - 04/17/11 07:16 AM
|
|
|
> Now, if only we had some boobies to look at
Not my forté but 'ere ya go.
|
--
A story of one man and his obsession with the female anatomy.
|
|
|
Re: We need more boobies!
[Re: GatKong]
#252005 - 04/17/11 12:30 PM
|
|
|
I think you missed the recent porn link incident that caused Twisty to bring the hammer down on nudity in the Bin.
|
Consider it high comedy....sincere tragedy....whatever...don't take it personally.
The Culture
|
|
Tomu Breidah |
No Problems, Only Solutions
|
|
|
Reged: 08/14/04
|
Posts: 6820
|
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: We need more boobies!
[Re: mogli]
#252019 - 04/17/11 04:38 PM
|
|
|
> I think you missed the recent porn link incident that caused Twisty to bring the > hammer down on nudity in the Bin.
Oh no. He canoes about it. All thanks to that Texas Jim character and his creepy / suspiciously inappropriate pics.
|
LEVEL-4
|
|
Tomu Breidah |
No Problems, Only Solutions
|
|
|
Reged: 08/14/04
|
Posts: 6820
|
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: We need more boobies!
[Re: Andrew]
#252020 - 04/17/11 04:40 PM
|
|
|
> > Now, if only we had some boobies to look at > > Not my forté but 'ere ya go.
Yeah, pierced belly buttons... Ick.
|
LEVEL-4
|
|
GatKong |
Tetris Mason
|
|
|
Reged: 04/20/07
|
Posts: 5907
|
Loc: Sector 9
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: We need more boobies!
[Re: mogli]
#252022 - 04/17/11 05:18 PM
|
|
|
> I think you missed the recent porn link incident that caused Twisty to bring the > hammer down on nudity in the Bin.
I believe it WAS Texas Jim, and his pedophiliac posts. I avoided opening his posts because I worried his pics were awfully young looking, and I'm sure italie and/orTwisty felt the same way. So, thanks to that leh-who-seh-hair, this woman will never drop that damn tee.
|
|
|
GatKong |
Tetris Mason
|
|
|
Reged: 04/20/07
|
Posts: 5907
|
Loc: Sector 9
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
|
>Not my forté but 'ere ya go.
Ya did just fine. [edit] Cyclical gifs that abruptly jump back to their beginning irk me though, so I fixed it [/edit]
So, Andrew.... who is mis-guided... me, for enjoying the visual titillation that is tits (and tits is even IN the word titillation),
Or you, for being drawn directly to the derriere, after which the human cleavage is supposedly modeled (even though derrierillation is NOT a word).
[ATTACHED IMAGE]
Edited by Gatinho (04/17/11 05:54 PM)
|
|
|
|
Re: FTFY
[Re: GatKong]
#252026 - 04/17/11 06:09 PM
|
|
|
> (even though derrierillation is NOT a word).
Buttocksication? Buttoxication? Yeah, that one.
I have nothing more to say here.
|
|
|