News Ultimarc Emu Loader Programming MAME Artwork progetto-SNAPS MAMEUI HBMAME EmuChat Hardware The Loony Bin MAME Artwork X

Entrance | Main Index | Search | New user | Login | Who's Online | FAQ | Rules

MAMEWorld >> EmuChat Previous   Index   Next   Collapse

Subject Poster Views Replies Posted on Re: HLSL MiniFAQ redk9258   3654    1    06/29/11 07:48 PM Ditto - Windows 7 64-bit Trebor          05/27/11 12:51 AM With all of this chat about Emus... redk9258   2435    3    04/12/12 02:08 AM Re: With all of this chat about Emus... Smitdogg          04/12/12 05:29 AM Re: With all of this chat about Emus... jeremymtc          04/12/12 05:24 AM Ostritch! Blasphemy! -nt- Matty_          04/12/12 10:04 AM Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?.. redk9258   3566    11    12/05/11 06:30 PM Woww, that was neat! mogli          12/11/11 09:14 AM bug in 0.144 ? DaffyDuck          12/07/11 01:00 AM Re: bug in 0.144 ? Tafoid          12/07/11 01:07 AM Re: bug in 0.144 ? DaffyDuck          12/08/11 03:07 AM Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?.. Llaffer          12/06/11 05:40 AM Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?.. redk9258          12/06/11 11:14 PM Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?.. Llaffer          12/07/11 05:50 AM Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?.. redk9258          12/07/11 02:48 PM Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?.. Smitdogg          12/05/11 06:57 PM Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?.. redk9258          12/05/11 08:17 PM Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?.. redk9258          12/06/11 02:06 AM Does anyone know what happened to mess.org? redk9258   1853    3    03/17/12 06:10 PM Re: Does anyone know what happened to mess.org? Smitdogg          03/17/12 06:14 PM Re: Does anyone know what happened to mess.org? italie          03/18/12 05:02 AM Re: Does anyone know what happened to mess.org? Outrun2006          03/19/12 05:26 PM Google Maps Ms Pac-Man redk9258   730    0    04/01/17 01:10 AM Possible bugs for MAME Testers Recapnation   744    3    06/11/20 08:48 PM Re: Possible bugs for MAME Testers Recapnation          07/03/20 04:10 PM Re: Possible bugs for MAME Testers Sthiryu          07/04/20 02:29 AM Re: Possible bugs for MAME Testers Recapnation          07/04/20 03:07 PM Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs reassembler   2252    11    11/14/12 03:56 PM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs Brian Deuel          11/20/12 11:22 AM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs reassembler          11/20/12 02:01 PM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs Foxhack          11/20/12 06:46 AM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs reassembler          11/20/12 11:20 AM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs Foxhack          11/21/12 02:12 AM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs yaggy          11/19/12 07:26 PM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs reassembler          11/19/12 11:51 PM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs yaggy          11/20/12 05:37 PM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs reassembler          11/20/12 07:07 PM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs R. Belmont          11/14/12 07:05 PM Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs CptGuapo          11/14/12 05:48 PM Interview with Yu Suzuki: The Making of AfterBurner 1988 reassembler   1038    0    11/15/13 02:14 PM Polybius Rom, real or fake? readytoplay   4794    7    04/07/11 01:54 AM Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake? Tafoid          04/07/11 02:00 AM Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake? mogli          04/08/11 01:29 AM Myth busted by public records from the Czech Republic GatKong          04/07/11 06:35 PM Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake? readytoplay          04/07/11 02:08 AM Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake? R. Belmont          04/07/11 02:29 AM Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake? Tafoid          04/07/11 02:24 AM Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake? jumpmaniac81          04/10/11 05:28 AM Roman help me ReadOnly   1980    1    01/01/11 12:45 PM Re: Roman help me Simone73          01/01/11 03:27 PM ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 ReadOnly   4185    20    10/24/10 02:58 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 Roman          10/24/10 06:40 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 John IV          10/24/10 06:17 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 abelenki          10/24/10 03:58 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 Heihachi_73          10/24/10 03:22 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 ShimaPong          10/24/10 03:52 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 Smitdogg          10/24/10 03:32 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 Heihachi_73          10/24/10 04:33 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 Naoki          10/24/10 10:52 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 R. Belmont          10/24/10 06:27 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 casm          10/24/10 08:58 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 R. Belmont          10/24/10 11:17 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 casm          10/25/10 02:13 AM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 abelenki          10/24/10 05:29 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 Heihachi_73          10/25/10 07:06 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 Foxhack          10/24/10 09:51 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 franciscohs          10/25/10 06:46 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 BIOS-D          10/25/10 06:54 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 Foxhack          10/25/10 09:05 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 Naoki          10/25/10 07:12 PM Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140 casm          10/25/10 08:42 PM 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat) ReadOnly   2228    7    11/15/10 09:57 AM Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat) Roman          11/15/10 10:59 AM Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat) ReadOnly          11/15/10 02:34 PM Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat) Roman          11/15/10 03:16 PM Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat) ReadOnly          11/16/10 12:48 AM Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat) Roman          11/16/10 10:25 AM Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat) ReadOnly          11/16/10 01:46 PM Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat) Roman          11/16/10 04:41 PM clrmame "missing but fixable" chd ReadOnly   3792    3    11/13/10 07:32 PM Re: clrmame "missing but fixable" chd Roman          11/13/10 08:27 PM Re: clrmame "missing but fixable" chd ReadOnly          11/14/10 08:27 AM Re: clrmame "missing but fixable" chd Roman          11/14/10 08:51 AM MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 ReadOnly   2877    13    11/21/10 11:12 PM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 tamalmalamarrado          12/01/10 07:13 AM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 karadaniano          11/30/10 02:47 PM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 redk9258          11/30/10 04:45 PM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 R. Belmont          11/22/10 04:27 PM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 ReadOnly          11/22/10 10:33 PM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 R. Belmont          11/22/10 11:25 PM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 ReadOnly          11/23/10 03:48 PM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 R. Belmont          11/23/10 05:10 PM Maybe his Internet was WriteOnly *nt* CrapBoardSoftware          11/22/10 07:09 PM Re: Maybe his Internet was WriteOnly *nt* ReadOnly          11/22/10 08:47 PM Re: Maybe his Internet was WriteOnly *nt* CrapBoardSoftware          11/22/10 09:36 PM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 John IV          11/22/10 01:37 AM Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64 Naoki          11/22/10 12:28 AM A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source ReadOnly   7032    21    10/12/11 05:18 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source hap          10/12/11 06:06 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source zambr          10/13/11 12:11 AM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source hap          10/13/11 01:10 AM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source redk9258          10/12/11 07:08 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source hap          10/12/11 07:19 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source redk9258          10/12/11 07:55 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source etabeta          10/12/11 08:15 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source Mamesick          10/13/11 07:29 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source mesk          10/13/11 08:14 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source Mamesick          10/13/11 08:19 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source B2K24          10/13/11 08:27 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source Mamesick          10/13/11 08:32 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source Ramirez          10/15/11 02:48 AM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source B2K24          10/12/11 08:01 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source redk9258          10/12/11 08:16 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source R. Belmont          10/13/11 04:29 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source etabeta          10/13/11 08:25 AM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source hap          10/12/11 08:40 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source redk9258          10/12/11 08:50 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source R. Belmont          10/12/11 10:48 PM Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source Smitdogg          10/12/11 11:00 PM Happy Birthday MAME thread (15th anniversary) ReadOnly   2754    14    02/06/12 02:35 PM Re: Happy Birthday MAME thread (15th anniversary) grog          02/06/12 03:40 PM Re: onlymho Hébus          02/06/12 04:26 PM Re: onlymho R. Belmont          02/06/12 06:01 PM Re: onlymho Hébus          02/06/12 08:00 PM Re: onlymho Anonymous          02/07/12 06:00 PM Re: onlymho Stiletto          02/08/12 06:27 AM Re: onlymho Ziggy100          02/14/12 09:34 PM Re: onlymho Stiletto          02/14/12 10:36 PM Re: onlymho stephh          02/14/12 11:24 PM Re: onlymho Stiletto          02/14/12 11:59 PM Re: onlymho Smitdogg          02/14/12 09:41 PM Re: onlymho B2K24          02/07/12 12:09 AM Re: onlymho Kale          02/06/12 05:35 PM Re: onlymho Hébus          02/06/12 07:40 PM 8088 mph we break all your emulators RdW   4520    14    04/08/15 09:56 AM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators Moose          04/09/15 01:26 AM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators jonwil          04/08/15 10:44 AM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators MooglyGuy          04/08/15 01:02 PM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators reenigne          04/08/15 04:05 PM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators MooglyGuy          04/09/15 04:32 PM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators reenigne          04/09/15 04:59 PM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators R. Belmont          04/08/15 10:07 PM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators reenigne          04/09/15 12:04 AM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators MooglyGuy          04/09/15 07:38 AM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators Vas Crabb          04/09/15 11:32 AM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators reenigne          04/09/15 10:47 AM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators R. Belmont          04/09/15 04:49 PM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators reenigne          04/09/15 05:06 PM Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators Olivier Galibert          04/10/15 08:22 AM worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard RdW   2576    21    10/04/16 08:22 PM Can it beat t7z though? Dullaron          10/09/16 11:03 AM Re: Can it beat t7z though? lharms          10/10/16 08:29 AM Re: Can it beat t7z though? R. Belmont          10/11/16 07:25 PM Re: Can it beat t7z though? lharms          10/12/16 01:36 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Roman          10/04/16 09:26 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard RdW          10/05/16 10:33 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard R. Belmont          10/06/16 04:54 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Tafoid          10/05/16 11:03 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Haze          10/05/16 10:47 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Master O          10/05/16 01:57 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Smitdogg          10/05/16 02:15 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard smf          10/06/16 01:50 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Haze          10/05/16 03:08 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Master O          10/05/16 03:22 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Haze          10/05/16 03:28 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard MooglyGuy          10/05/16 09:34 AM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Haze          10/05/16 09:31 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard R. Belmont          10/06/16 05:04 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Traso          10/05/16 06:44 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard MooglyGuy          10/05/16 07:55 PM Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard Traso          10/09/16 02:51 AM Hello!!! RC Roger   987    1    01/11/13 01:04 PM Re: Hello!!! Naoki          01/11/13 01:22 PM Sega N-Sub RaZer   1076    0    05/24/14 07:14 AM Pages: << 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 >>

Extra information Permissions Legend: Moderator:  Robbbert, Tafoid  0 registered and 279 anonymous users are browsing this forum. You cannot start new topics You cannot reply to topics HTML is enabled UBBCode is enabled New posts New posts       No new posts No new posts

Browser Test | Delete Cookies atom-guru atom-guru atom-guru atom-guru UBB.threads™ 6.3.2