News
Ultimarc
Emu Loader
Programming
MAME Artwork
progetto-SNAPS
MAMEUI
HBMAME
EmuChat
Hardware
The Loony Bin
MAME Artwork X
Entrance
|
Main Index
|
Search
|
New user
|
Login
|
Who's Online
|
FAQ
|
Rules
MAMEWorld
>>
EmuChat
Previous
Index
Next
Collapse
Subject
Poster
Views
Replies
Posted on
Re: HLSL MiniFAQ
redk9258
3656
1
06/29/11 07:48 PM
Ditto - Windows 7 64-bit
Trebor
05/27/11 12:51 AM
With all of this chat about Emus...
redk9258
2440
3
04/12/12 02:08 AM
Re: With all of this chat about Emus...
Smitdogg
04/12/12 05:29 AM
Re: With all of this chat about Emus...
jeremymtc
04/12/12 05:24 AM
Ostritch! Blasphemy! -nt-
Matty_
04/12/12 10:04 AM
Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?..
redk9258
3570
11
12/05/11 06:30 PM
Woww, that was neat!
mogli
12/11/11 09:14 AM
bug in 0.144 ?
DaffyDuck
12/07/11 01:00 AM
Re: bug in 0.144 ?
Tafoid
12/07/11 01:07 AM
Re: bug in 0.144 ?
DaffyDuck
12/08/11 03:07 AM
Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?..
Llaffer
12/06/11 05:40 AM
Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?..
redk9258
12/06/11 11:14 PM
Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?..
Llaffer
12/07/11 05:50 AM
Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?..
redk9258
12/07/11 02:48 PM
Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?..
Smitdogg
12/05/11 06:57 PM
Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?..
redk9258
12/05/11 08:17 PM
Re: Can someone try out Dig Dug in MAME 0.144u2?..
redk9258
12/06/11 02:06 AM
Does anyone know what happened to mess.org?
redk9258
1855
3
03/17/12 06:10 PM
Re: Does anyone know what happened to mess.org?
Smitdogg
03/17/12 06:14 PM
Re: Does anyone know what happened to mess.org?
italie
03/18/12 05:02 AM
Re: Does anyone know what happened to mess.org?
Outrun2006
03/19/12 05:26 PM
Google Maps Ms Pac-Man
redk9258
733
0
04/01/17 01:10 AM
Possible bugs for MAME Testers
Recapnation
747
3
06/11/20 08:48 PM
Re: Possible bugs for MAME Testers
Recapnation
07/03/20 04:10 PM
Re: Possible bugs for MAME Testers
Sthiryu
07/04/20 02:29 AM
Re: Possible bugs for MAME Testers
Recapnation
07/04/20 03:07 PM
Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
reassembler
2254
11
11/14/12 03:56 PM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
Brian Deuel
11/20/12 11:22 AM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
reassembler
11/20/12 02:01 PM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
Foxhack
11/20/12 06:46 AM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
reassembler
11/20/12 11:20 AM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
Foxhack
11/21/12 02:12 AM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
yaggy
11/19/12 07:26 PM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
reassembler
11/19/12 11:51 PM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
yaggy
11/20/12 05:37 PM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
reassembler
11/20/12 07:07 PM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
R. Belmont
11/14/12 07:05 PM
Re: Power Drift & Afterburner Easter Eggs
CptGuapo
11/14/12 05:48 PM
Interview with Yu Suzuki: The Making of AfterBurner 1988
reassembler
1040
0
11/15/13 02:14 PM
Polybius Rom, real or fake?
readytoplay
4797
7
04/07/11 01:54 AM
Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake?
Tafoid
04/07/11 02:00 AM
Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake?
mogli
04/08/11 01:29 AM
Myth busted by public records from the Czech Republic
GatKong
04/07/11 06:35 PM
Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake?
readytoplay
04/07/11 02:08 AM
Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake?
R. Belmont
04/07/11 02:29 AM
Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake?
Tafoid
04/07/11 02:24 AM
Re: Polybius Rom, real or fake?
jumpmaniac81
04/10/11 05:28 AM
Roman help me
ReadOnly
1983
1
01/01/11 12:45 PM
Re: Roman help me
Simone73
01/01/11 03:27 PM
ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
ReadOnly
4190
20
10/24/10 02:58 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
Roman
10/24/10 06:40 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
John IV
10/24/10 06:17 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
abelenki
10/24/10 03:58 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
Heihachi_73
10/24/10 03:22 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
ShimaPong
10/24/10 03:52 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
Smitdogg
10/24/10 03:32 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
Heihachi_73
10/24/10 04:33 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
Naoki
10/24/10 10:52 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
R. Belmont
10/24/10 06:27 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
casm
10/24/10 08:58 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
R. Belmont
10/24/10 11:17 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
casm
10/25/10 02:13 AM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
abelenki
10/24/10 05:29 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
Heihachi_73
10/25/10 07:06 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
Foxhack
10/24/10 09:51 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
franciscohs
10/25/10 06:46 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
BIOS-D
10/25/10 06:54 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
Foxhack
10/25/10 09:05 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
Naoki
10/25/10 07:12 PM
Re: ssf2ghw removed in MAME 0.140
casm
10/25/10 08:42 PM
0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat)
ReadOnly
2230
7
11/15/10 09:57 AM
Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat)
Roman
11/15/10 10:59 AM
Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat)
ReadOnly
11/15/10 02:34 PM
Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat)
Roman
11/15/10 03:16 PM
Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat)
ReadOnly
11/16/10 12:48 AM
Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat)
Roman
11/16/10 10:25 AM
Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat)
ReadOnly
11/16/10 01:46 PM
Re: 0.140 samples (clrmamepro dat)
Roman
11/16/10 04:41 PM
clrmame "missing but fixable" chd
ReadOnly
3798
3
11/13/10 07:32 PM
Re: clrmame "missing but fixable" chd
Roman
11/13/10 08:27 PM
Re: clrmame "missing but fixable" chd
ReadOnly
11/14/10 08:27 AM
Re: clrmame "missing but fixable" chd
Roman
11/14/10 08:51 AM
MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
ReadOnly
2888
13
11/21/10 11:12 PM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
tamalmalamarrado
12/01/10 07:13 AM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
karadaniano
11/30/10 02:47 PM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
redk9258
11/30/10 04:45 PM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
R. Belmont
11/22/10 04:27 PM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
ReadOnly
11/22/10 10:33 PM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
R. Belmont
11/22/10 11:25 PM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
ReadOnly
11/23/10 03:48 PM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
R. Belmont
11/23/10 05:10 PM
Maybe his Internet was WriteOnly *nt*
CrapBoardSoftware
11/22/10 07:09 PM
Re: Maybe his Internet was WriteOnly *nt*
ReadOnly
11/22/10 08:47 PM
Re: Maybe his Internet was WriteOnly *nt*
CrapBoardSoftware
11/22/10 09:36 PM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
John IV
11/22/10 01:37 AM
Re: MAME is very fast since I run it on Win7 x64
Naoki
11/22/10 12:28 AM
A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
ReadOnly
7040
21
10/12/11 05:18 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
hap
10/12/11 06:06 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
zambr
10/13/11 12:11 AM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
hap
10/13/11 01:10 AM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
redk9258
10/12/11 07:08 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
hap
10/12/11 07:19 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
redk9258
10/12/11 07:55 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
etabeta
10/12/11 08:15 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
Mamesick
10/13/11 07:29 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
mesk
10/13/11 08:14 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
Mamesick
10/13/11 08:19 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
B2K24
10/13/11 08:27 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
Mamesick
10/13/11 08:32 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
Ramirez
10/15/11 02:48 AM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
B2K24
10/12/11 08:01 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
redk9258
10/12/11 08:16 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
R. Belmont
10/13/11 04:29 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
etabeta
10/13/11 08:25 AM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
hap
10/12/11 08:40 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
redk9258
10/12/11 08:50 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
R. Belmont
10/12/11 10:48 PM
Re: A no fruit machine/pinball subtarget in mame source
Smitdogg
10/12/11 11:00 PM
Happy Birthday MAME thread (15th anniversary)
ReadOnly
2761
14
02/06/12 02:35 PM
Re: Happy Birthday MAME thread (15th anniversary)
grog
02/06/12 03:40 PM
Re: onlymho
Hébus
02/06/12 04:26 PM
Re: onlymho
R. Belmont
02/06/12 06:01 PM
Re: onlymho
Hébus
02/06/12 08:00 PM
Re: onlymho
Anonymous
02/07/12 06:00 PM
Re: onlymho
Stiletto
02/08/12 06:27 AM
Re: onlymho
Ziggy100
02/14/12 09:34 PM
Re: onlymho
Stiletto
02/14/12 10:36 PM
Re: onlymho
stephh
02/14/12 11:24 PM
Re: onlymho
Stiletto
02/14/12 11:59 PM
Re: onlymho
Smitdogg
02/14/12 09:41 PM
Re: onlymho
B2K24
02/07/12 12:09 AM
Re: onlymho
Kale
02/06/12 05:35 PM
Re: onlymho
Hébus
02/06/12 07:40 PM
8088 mph we break all your emulators
RdW
4523
14
04/08/15 09:56 AM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
Moose
04/09/15 01:26 AM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
jonwil
04/08/15 10:44 AM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
MooglyGuy
04/08/15 01:02 PM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
reenigne
04/08/15 04:05 PM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
MooglyGuy
04/09/15 04:32 PM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
reenigne
04/09/15 04:59 PM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
R. Belmont
04/08/15 10:07 PM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
reenigne
04/09/15 12:04 AM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
MooglyGuy
04/09/15 07:38 AM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
Vas Crabb
04/09/15 11:32 AM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
reenigne
04/09/15 10:47 AM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
R. Belmont
04/09/15 04:49 PM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
reenigne
04/09/15 05:06 PM
Re: 8088 mph we break all your emulators
Olivier Galibert
04/10/15 08:22 AM
worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
RdW
2584
21
10/04/16 08:22 PM
Can it beat t7z though?
Dullaron
10/09/16 11:03 AM
Re: Can it beat t7z though?
lharms
10/10/16 08:29 AM
Re: Can it beat t7z though?
R. Belmont
10/11/16 07:25 PM
Re: Can it beat t7z though?
lharms
10/12/16 01:36 AM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Roman
10/04/16 09:26 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
RdW
10/05/16 10:33 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
R. Belmont
10/06/16 04:54 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Tafoid
10/05/16 11:03 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Haze
10/05/16 10:47 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Master O
10/05/16 01:57 AM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Smitdogg
10/05/16 02:15 AM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
smf
10/06/16 01:50 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Haze
10/05/16 03:08 AM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Master O
10/05/16 03:22 AM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Haze
10/05/16 03:28 AM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
MooglyGuy
10/05/16 09:34 AM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Haze
10/05/16 09:31 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
R. Belmont
10/06/16 05:04 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Traso
10/05/16 06:44 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
MooglyGuy
10/05/16 07:55 PM
Re: worth a look?: smaller-and-faster-data-compression-with -zstandard
Traso
10/09/16 02:51 AM
Hello!!!
RC Roger
989
1
01/11/13 01:04 PM
Re: Hello!!!
Naoki
01/11/13 01:22 PM
Sega N-Sub
RaZer
1079
0
05/24/14 07:14 AM
Pages:
<<
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
>>
Extra information
Permissions
Legend:
Moderator:
Robbbert
,
Tafoid
0 registered and 520 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
New posts
New posts
No new posts
No new posts
Browser Test
|
Delete Cookies
atom-guru
atom-guru
atom-guru
atom-guru
UBB.threads™ 6.3.2